Should i buy canon eos 7d or 60d

See more galleries ». Latest in-depth reviews. Read more reviews ». Latest buying guides. Best video cameras for photographers in Best cameras for Instagram in Best drones in Best cameras for vlogging in Check out more buying guides ». Nikon Z9 initial review. Sony a7 IV initial review. Nikon Nikkor Z mm F2. Sigma mm F Discover more challenges ». Nikon Z9 3. Popular interchangable lens cameras ». Popular compact cameras ».

Shedding some light on the sources of noise. Mobile site. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited. Flat view. I calibrate all my lenses with micro adjust and on some it has made a huge difference. The 60D does not have this feature but the 7D does. This means that what you see through the viewfinder is what you get in your image. Durability, weather proofing and body construction are the final main differentiation for me.

There are other minor details you can see in the table above but the construction differences between the 2 are what I would consider to be the final main point for consideration. The 7D features a weather sealed magnesium body shown in the diagram on the right and the 60D is made entirely of polycarbonate plastic.

Granted, the polycarbonates that Canon are using these days are incredibly strong, not your average plastic, but a magnesium body is still going to withstand more extreme uses. What is interesting is that the 60D predecessor the 50D did have a magnesium alloy body. This to me is a clear indication of how Canon wanted to widen the gap between the 7D and the T2i. Which one to buy then? Purely my opinions here but I would say that if you are looking at either of these purely for shooting video then the manual audio and flip out screen gives the 60D the edge with 2 caveats.

Firstly you have to be planning on not shooting the videos in extreme low light and secondly not shooting in inclement weather conditions. If either of those two things are likely then the 7D takes the lead again. If you are looking at either camera just for shooting photos then the 7D is the hands down winner. Now for the tricky part, you want to shoot both stills and video in equal amounts….. If you shoot wildlife and sports then the 7D will give your photos the edge. If its just landscape photos where AF speed is not a factor then I think you will find the 60D a very competent camera.

And also from Amazon here. I am curious as to why they went with a SD slot for the 60D. They used to catch some pros with the 40d, 50d etc but now they want those guys to get the 7d instead. SD card is there because they are trying to catch the people moving up from smaller cameras and all the smaller cameras have SD cards.

CF is seen as more professional therefore aspirational feature for the 7d. I have a couple of questions: 1. Does it shoot both video and stills at the same time? How quickly can you shoot modes?

I bought a lower end Sony handheld this spring that is all digital but I am really disappointed how long it takes to upload the shots.

Any comments on how much slower the 60D will be to upload than the 7D? Would a card reader circumvent this issue? You will get a full 18mp image , but there will be a gap in the video of about 2 seconds. Alternatively you can pull a still image from the video which would measure xpixels so for web its pretty good.

They thing here is to shoot with a shutter speed that is a bit higher than normal so that when you pull the frame, it is not too blurry. Most video camera shoot with a much slower shutter speed than a stills camera, when the frames are played together it looks nice and smooth ,but an individual frame is quite blurry if the subject is moving.

On the 60D and other canon cameras you can select a higher shutter speed so it can look ok. Though still not as good as a full quality still would be. That said there are some disadvantages to high shutter speed video which can be googled. This is a VERY slow way to do things. A card reader will speed up the process many times over. I never use anything but a card reader. Even a cheap one will make an enormous difference. If you know your camera and your lenses, you should be able to focus 10x faster than an auto focus and just as accurately, without having the potential for it to jump out of focus.

The only time I could possibly see it being used would be as an official photographer field-side at a football game, but the system would have to work a lot faster before I would consider it.

If so its worth people considering the various types of autofocus and how they differ when using liveview and when shooting still images. AF for still shooting is remarkably fast these days and I doubt anyone can match the speed of the camera.

Contrast detect AF for liveiew though is pretty slow still. And so far requires the lens to be wide open to perform it. Very helpful comparison. Any thoughts on this? Purely speculation of course, but 5d would make more sense to deal with first. And also their video based camera which im sure must be in the pipeline. Having shot a feature length film on a 5Dmk2 and using an external monitor, I welcome an articulating screen on all the Canon Line.

Also having to deal with the poor live view functions of the HDMI out is a major pain. Since most everything on the audio side of production and most professional video cameras have moved to SD cards, I welcome the pro line HDDSLR of cameras to move to towards that direction.

The only negative I see is not having a full sized sensor. But then a lot of cool work is happening with the crop sensors and they have a place. I would pick the 60D over the 7D just over the articulating screen and the video added features of audio control. Of course if Canon would update the firmware to have those features I might just stick with the 7D and external monitor. After all, I take all the production still from the same camera used to shoot the video…it is nice having that pro level duality in a camera.

Great insight Bob thanks! Yes I think for video the screen is great, until they put out a camera that had solid HD-SDI connectors for external monitors. At that point I think external will be the way to go. Thanks for posting. Great comparison of the two models. But I wonder why you think the 7D has a low-light advantage over the 60D? It seems both will have similar noise performance with the 81MP sensor.

Thank you, one and all for the information and sharing. I am at a point where I need to buy one of these cameras, and this information is invaluable. So none of that full frame dreamy stuff for me. It is a tragedy that many people imagine that the full frame is closer to 35mm movie cameras in depth of field.

Truth is, full frame is closer to 35mm stills depth of frame and is way more exaggerated in its shallowness than 35mm movie depth of field, which is better replicated by the APS-C sensors on these two cameras being discussed here.

The 60D wins out on something as flippant pun intended as the screen, I am afraid! I too was debating the 60D vs. The 7D is an awesome camera, but the 60D, with its smaller size and the screen, wins for me.

I have to wait to have it in my hands prior to deciding however. Shooting videos is part of my routine too, and I think the screen will helps. As I uses my camera for hobby mainly, and my kids, the price of the 7D might not be justifiable. This is an excellent and helpful article. The only thing the 60D had going for it was the openable screen for video. Thanks for the article! Thanks Dan. I am planning a purchase for video and your article was very helpful.

It really was a tossup between two things:. Unfortunately audio is hugely important, but if the 7D did get a firmware update it would be the first choice for me. Such an oversight on that camera. Of course a full sensor would be nice but what you gonna do. Still the 60D is pretty great. I am using a ISI5 which has the viewfinder like the new 60D and as I am looking at what I weill upgrade too have been considering nothing without this great feature, it is magic.

Actually this camera for a point and shoot is too. No reason to by the 7D except for a great deal. Do you drop them that often? As for AF points. If ever there was a pissing contest this is the new one now that MP has been shelved because they can make cheaper better processors. AF Points? How many is enough? Nikon likes Does that make theirs qualitatively better? Anyway…thanks for the comment. For me, yes sometimes my cameras get a beating because of the work that I do with them.

I realize not everyone is doing the same thing. My cameras are tools for my job and nothing more, I do not need to treat them with kid gloves because I know they are sturdy and for some people that is a reason for titanium.

You might survive a car crash without an airbag too….. Af points. You sound like a man who has never used a multitude of different cameras. Quite simply yes it makes a huge difference to the accuracy. Do you think that 60D is a good camera for an amateur that want to buy his first slr? Video is my main reason. For sound,i can buy an external system. I also take sports pictures parkour.

Read ur post but still am not ready 2 chose either. Assuming i want 2 make movies esp action and adventure sports and documentaries,please suggest me a dslr. Also send a reply 2 my email if u can pls.

Hey Dan, So I am about to buy a new camera and I have worked with the 7D on many video shoots and it has been great, the image is comparable to a REDone! I do a lot of nature and outdoorsy type cinematography and photography and so the 7D hooked me with its weather sealing.

Is there a chance of that happening soon? Let me know what you think. Arlen, the 7D has only been out for one year. Almost exactly 1 year in fact. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable. No dedicated AF-assist lamp flash is used , and AF-assist adjustment is buried in the Flash Settings menu; Kit lens mm isn't quite up to the resolving power of the megapixel sensor, odd focal length for subframe DSLR; No continuous autofocus in Movie mode.

Excellent megapixel sensor with superb detail; Very good high ISO performance, especially for megapixel subframe sensor; 3. Body not as rugged as mag-alloy 50D; AF assist only works when flash is up, though flash can be forced off; Auto-exposure not reliable in very low light; No continuous autofocus in Movie mode. Leave Feedback. Overview Specifications Image Quality. APS-C A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter.

Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one. How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 60D and the Canon 7D place the cameras among the top in their class?

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the 60D and the 7D in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon , address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

This is why expert reviews are important. As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice. Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review.

Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time. Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review , just use the search menu below.

There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features. If so, please get in touch , so that we can correct the information. A potelyt. PW , Aug 28,